That’s why I essentially gave up trying to get anything done about it because clearly Blizzard care more about saying they’re doing things to combat botting than actually combatting botting. they’ve been botting for 3-4 years with no action taken against them. The same people I discussed in that thread are still doing it now, and they’d been doing it for years when that thread was current, i.e. I’d obviously prefer that Blizzard actually cared about the integrity of their game and actually enforced the EULA by banning botters but, as you’ll see from the thread I linked to on the old forums, I was already trying to get something done about this two years ago. Or have a few separate leaderboards each with their own paragon cap, 2,000 4,000 5,000+ Diablo 3 will get that kind of leaderboard had it not moved to Classic Game.
The forum rules exist to prevent accusations, precisely because of how easy it would be to for false allegations to be made, thereby besmirching the reputation of the accused. Instead of a across-the-board paragon cap, have a leaderboard paragon cap at something like 2,000.
That’s why I essentially gave up trying to get anything done about it because clearly Blizzard care more about saying they’re doing things to combat botting than actually combatting botting.When someone “names and shames” another player by accusing them of botting, essentially they’re breaking the rules in order to report that someone else is breaking the rules. The forum rules exist to prevent accusations, precisely because of how easy it would be to for false allegations to be made, thereby besmirching the reputation of the accused. When someone “names and shames” another player by accusing them of botting, essentially they’re breaking the rules in order to report that someone else is breaking the rules.
0 kommentar(er)
